In a significant departure from its post-2020 stance on Chinese investment, the Government of India has issued an order allowing four companies with Chinese ownership or technological links to bid for public power sector projects. The order, dated June 24, 2026, issued by the Procurement Policy Division of the Finance Ministry’s Department of Expenditure, grants a two-year exemption to TBEA Energy India, Nanjing Electric India, New Northeast Electric India, and Taikai Electric (India) from the requirement to register with the Indian government before bidding for critical public projects — a registration earlier mandated for firms from countries sharing a land border with India.
This decision follows a request from the Ministry of Power in January 2026 and inter-ministerial deliberation by the Committee of Secretaries and the Registration Committee under the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). Notably, the order explicitly states that this exemption “may not be considered as a precedent,” signalling the government’s intent to manage this as a calibrated, sector-specific relaxation rather than a wholesale policy reversal.
💡 Get AI-powered exam prep on your phone!
This development carries substantial weight for UPSC Mains GS-III (Indian Economy, Infrastructure, Effects of Liberalisation) and GS-II (Government Policies, India’s neighbourhood and bilateral economic relations), and is a recurring theme in current-affairs-based SSC questions on economic policy and India-China relations.
Background and Context
Following the Galwan Valley clashes of 2020, India had amended its Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) policy through “Press Note 3,” mandating prior government approval for investments from countries sharing a land border with India — primarily targeting China — to prevent opportunistic takeovers of financially stressed Indian firms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Simultaneously, government procurement rules required firms with Chinese linkages to register with a government-run committee before participating in public tenders, a discretionary approval process.
Five Important Key Points
- The Finance Ministry’s Expenditure Department, through an order dated June 24, 2026, granted a two-year exemption to four Chinese-linked firms from mandatory pre-registration requirements for bidding on public power sector projects.
- The four beneficiary firms are TBEA Energy India (a TBEA Group subsidiary), Nanjing Electric India (a Nanjing Electric subsidiary), New Northeast Electric India (with technology-transfer ties to Chinese firms), and Taikai Electric India (a Taikai Group subsidiary).
- The relaxation follows a January 2026 request from the Ministry of Power and inter-ministerial deliberation involving the Committee of Secretaries and the DPIIT-led Registration Committee.
- This builds upon an earlier May 2026 notification permitting overseas companies with Chinese shareholding of up to 10% to invest in India through the automatic route rather than requiring prior government approval, partially relaxing “Press Note 3” of 2020.
- The order explicitly disclaims precedential value, stating such exemptions “may not be considered as a precedent,” reflecting a calibrated rather than structural policy shift.
Historical and Policy Background
Press Note 3 (2020) was among the most consequential FDI policy interventions in India’s recent economic history, fundamentally altering the automatic-route investment regime for neighbouring countries. While intended as a pandemic-era safeguard against distressed-asset acquisition, it has had lasting effects on sectors requiring Chinese equipment and capital, particularly renewable energy, telecom, and power transmission, where Chinese firms hold significant global manufacturing scale and cost advantages.
Economic Implications and Data
India’s power sector modernisation — spanning grid upgrades, renewable energy integration, and EV charging infrastructure — requires equipment often manufactured competitively in China. Restricting Chinese-linked firms from public tenders had reportedly constrained project timelines and increased costs in specific segments. The Congress opposition highlighted that India’s trade deficit with China continues to reach “record levels,” a concern also reflected in a recent Reader’s Editor correction regarding GST revenue data tied to import growth, underscoring the broader trade-dependency debate accompanying this relaxation.
Governance and Institutional Dimensions
The decision-making chain — Ministry of Power request, Committee of Secretaries review, DPIIT Registration Committee clearance, and Finance Ministry order — illustrates India’s layered inter-ministerial approval architecture for sensitive economic decisions. This layered scrutiny is designed to balance security concerns with economic pragmatism, though critics argue it lacks transparency, as such orders are typically not proactively publicised.
Geopolitical Dimension
This relaxation coincides with broader signals of a “continuing thaw” in India-China economic relations, alongside China’s Foreign Ministry response to the India-Japan economic partnership framework unveiled during Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi’s visit, in which Beijing urged that “cooperation between countries should not target any third party.” The juxtaposition — easing China-linked investment domestically while diversifying strategic partnerships with Japan on critical minerals — reflects India’s characteristic multi-alignment approach in economic diplomacy.
Political and Opposition Reaction
The Congress party has termed the move “calibrated capitulation” to China, linking it to India’s widening trade deficit and unresolved boundary frictions in Arunachal Pradesh and eastern Ladakh. This reflects the classic tension in Indian economic policymaking between security-driven restriction and growth-driven pragmatism.
Bihar Connection
Bihar’s own power infrastructure modernisation — including grid strengthening under the Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme and rural electrification — depends significantly on cost-competitive equipment procurement. Should Chinese-linked firms re-enter the broader public tendering ecosystem, Bihar’s state power utilities (like NBPDCL and SBPDCL) could potentially access cheaper equipment for transmission and distribution upgrades, though this must be weighed against strategic sourcing risks the Centre’s registration framework was designed to mitigate.
Way Forward
India needs a transparent, published criterion-based framework — rather than discretionary, case-by-case exemptions — that clearly delineates which technology segments merit relaxation and which remain security-sensitive. Simultaneously, sustained investment in domestic manufacturing under the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for power equipment must reduce structural dependency on Chinese suppliers over the medium term.
Relevance for UPSC and SSC Examinations
GS-II: India’s bilateral economic relations with China, government policy formulation. GS-III: FDI policy, Press Note 3, infrastructure financing, power sector reforms. Key Terms: Press Note 3 (2020), DPIIT, Committee of Secretaries, automatic route FDI, Procurement Policy Division.